My Kind of Conservative: Mark Sanford

...only he doesn't seem like a real conservative in common usage of the term. (He seems more like the L word ;))
The governor from South Carolina has credentials...at least on a cursory level...to get me to finally vote GOP for President for the first time in my life.
Reason's Matt Welch has the story about new expose' on Sanford at the American Conservative magazine.
Highlights that caught my eye:
He calls the public-education system "a Soviet-style monopoly." He promoted school choice through tax rebates to avoid the appearance of government control
...opposed REAL ID on civil liberties grounds.
But the governor edges closer to pure libertarianism at times. He rolls his eyes at the Columbia sheriff's department's zeal in investigating Michael Phelps's recreational pot use. And he criticizes Alan Greenspan's management of the "opaque" Federal Reserve. "If you take human nature out of a Fed, it might work," he explains. "But you can't. You can have these wise men. But who wants to turn off the spigot at a party that's rolling?"
He also deviates from the Republican line on foreign policy....When asked about the invasion of Iraq, he extends his critique beyond the constitutional niceties. "I don't believe in preemptive war," he says flatly. "For us to hold the moral high ground in the world, our default position must be defensive."
Well, I'll be...
How refreshing.
I don't give a damn what party someone belongs to. If they have the guts and conviction to say all that.
More from the American Conservative :
Mark Sanford is easy to overlook. If Republicans need a champion in the Obama era, there are more colorful candidates than the South Carolina governor.
...
He doesn’t play electric bass, or to the Religious Right, like Mike Huckabee. He has made no attempt to rewrite the GOP’s almost forgotten small-government playbook like Minnesota’s Tim Pawlenty or Louisiana’s Bobby Jindal. Though he is popular, Sanford seems incapable of playing a red-meat populist like Sarah Palin. He looks plain, his philosophy is old, and he has an elegiac demeanor that seems incompatible with electoral politics.
...If the promise of “hope” in the form of bailouts fails to revive the American economy, Mark Sanford will be the GOP’s most dangerous man in 2012.
In recent weeks, he has become the unofficial spokesman against Obama’s trillion-dollar economic stimulus plan.
Sanford has threatened to decline large portions of the bailout, preferring not to bridle South Carolinians with the accompanying obligations. While cable’s talking heads shout at him, he somberly quotes Adam Smith and Friedrich Hayek. He worries aloud that the bailouts represent a “crisis of American civilization.”
But Sanford’s stringent free-market philosophy was born in experience before it was matured by theory.
Very nice. I like the guy.
What do our conservatives and registered Republicans think?
Sure, there's something to surly dislike for some of you...matters of religion or war perhaps. Maybe even his fiscal stinginess or underwhelmed view of spending. But overall, what say you?
- John's diary
- Login or register to post comments

Comments :
a badge of honor
from the AmCon link:
It keeps getting better. I like this guy.
Priceless
LOL. Nice.
That is refreshing.
Of course, I'd be interested to see what his spending priorities are. Also, while a bright, sensible Republican presidential candidate might tempt me to vote for him, there is simply no way I could vote for the Republican party in its current form.
But it matters, far more than any demonstrations of conviction. The president is only one person. A person who is constantly torn in a thousand different directions, owes a thousand favors and needs to work with a congress who is all over the place. I cannot accept a cabinet and federal agencies dominated by Republican political appointees any longer. I've seen some polls that show that the party brand is the most determining factor in a presidential contest, and for good reason. We may not have a parliamentary system, but in terms of effect on government we are voting for a party far more than for a person.
Still, I'd like to see someone with his credentials in the race, if nothing more than to keep the other candidates honest.
An aside: it seems that John Huntsman in Utah has also been exhibiting some independant thought. Is it a coincidence that UT and SC are two of the most Republican states? It seems that the more secure your political base is, the freer you are to act on principle. Swing-state governors may have to rack up too many favors to put them over the top.
He seems like a pretty good
He seems like a pretty good option to me. I don't know about his foreign policy as I used to be a hawk, but I'm becoming more mellow on that issue. Also, I think he probably is a SoCon, but perhaps that kind that will appeal to the more secular, which definitely be a good thing.
Just to be clear being a
Just to be clear being a SoCon a good thing to me, but I figure it might not be for you.
JM, I couldn't care less what his personal views are
Whether or not he's a SoCon at heart makes no difference to me. The key is whether or not he chooses to govern on that basis or use the power of the executive to pursue a SoCon agenda.
Being a SoCon is not the issue in and of itself.
A man can be the biggest SoCon in the world in his private life and still govern dispassionately without his personal views getting in the way.
I think he's a politically
I think he's a politically SoCon too though - I would be rather suprised to see his state elect a social liberal. That said there isn't a lot of governance in the executive currently that has to do with Social issues besides judges, so you might not notice it much, except I think he would pick great originalist judges.
My Only Thing..
..is that he was fond of comparing Obama's stimulus plan to Stalinist grain plans, grandstanding against it
on the Sunday shows. Which would be fine, if he didn't actually take the money the day before
. Just sayin--if you are all for vetoing the unnecessary spending in your state, stay consistent. However, my latent fiscal conservatism does like his ability to at least sometimes take a stand.
http://wealthweekly.blogspot.com
Wii FC:2805-8311-8040-2678 Brawl: 2277-7051-2186
I'll just say no thanks
to Sanford.
You don't get to compare Obama's stimulus plan with divisive Stalinist rhetoric while you reach out your hand for the money.
(And the subtle or not so subtle cues on Fox News gently push the meme that Black Liberation Theology is rooted in Marxism/Communism/Stalinism. Gasoline meet match. Red Alert.)
Although I am sure his constituents appreciate his hypocrisy of taking the much needed funds with one hand and pointing his finger at BHO/Stalin with the other.
I'm only half stupid
And was he saying this
back when it mattered or only now that he an say it without going against a sitting president? Maybe he way but given that he still has presidential hopes for the GOP I doubt it.
Absolutely not.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I spoke with him briefly at the TEA Party in Charleston.
I am in agreement, he's a stud, and gets the "you gotta take your hat off to 'em" award for standing true to his principles.
We're happy to have him here!
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis!