in response to "American Agression".  American agression?  Why is Obama antagonizing an already enflamed sitution?  The article does not indicate the specifics of the of this American Agression but one thing is clear, Obama is now at the helm and therefore responsible for inflaming this international situation that endangers millions.

Apparently Hillary's "strong rhetoric" is no match for their nuclear ambitions.  Let us see if another round of name calling will put them in their place.

Obama should be out there publicly praising the Norht Koreans and peaceful humanitarians, and denouncing our American Imperialist oppression of them.  Without any such statement from Obama Bush's vile insult by including North Korea in the Axis of Evil continues to stand as the official American stance for the US.  Obama must reverse this immediately if we are to peacefully quell these tensions.  We must stand down and give in to all of the North Koreans demands because, as we know from Bush, failing to do this constitutes reckless disregard for the safety of the region, nay the entire world.

Defiant North Korea 'to weaponize plutonium'

"No matter how hard the U.S.-led hostile forces may try all sorts of isolation and blockade, the DPRK (Democratic People's Republic of Korea), a proud nuclear power, will not flinch from them," KCNA said.

...

U.S. President Barack Obama's special envoy to North Korea, Stephen Bosworth, called "simply groundless" accusations by Pyongyang that its nuclear and rocket tests were in response to American aggression.

More UN sanctions are just continuing the failed policies of the past.  Rather than sanctions we should be sending them food, and money, and more Plutonium so that they will like us.  This is the only way we can atone for our past sins against them.  We should publicly beg for their forgiveness.

Obama must act NOW.

Meta: If you can't hear the sarcasm in this comment, I can't help you.

See, I told you this was going to get interesting. 

The U.S. on Saturday refused to accept hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's claim of a landslide re-election victory in Iran and said it was looking into allegations of election fraud.

While I applaud the intentions, I wonder just how we might go about performing an audit of this election.  Send in chad counters?

And this Forbes article from just before the election is priceless.

Only four candidates are allowed on the ballot box on the eve of the June 12 presidential elections in Iran. The outsider among these four is also the youngest; he is most energetic, highly entertaining and a virulently anti-Semitic incumbent known to the world as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. And he has already lost the election.  

[snip]

The political death of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may appear as a new and shocking story to the outside world, but inside Iran it has been widely expected and, in fact, anticipated by both the elite and ordinary people alike. How did a man who captured the hatred of the world with his constant anti-Semitic rhetoric, yet was considered the hero of religious ghettos and disenfranchised revolutionaries' fall from power so quickly?

An evil man uses his power to remain in office.  How unexpected.

I'd change my bar color to green in support of the Iranian people, but it already is!