Happy New Year
Open thread for reflections on 2007, predictions for 2008, and any other random comments.
Submitted by Brendan on Tue, 2008-01-01 00:51
Tags:
Open thread for reflections on 2007, predictions for 2008, and any other random comments.
Comments :
happy new year guys!
Just saw the new Des Moines Register poll which shows Obama and Huckabee leading. I don't believe it.
My non-final predictions:
Clinton: 40%
Obama: 34%
Edwards: 26%
Romney: 58%
Huckabee: 42%
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
oh and
I still support Giuliani. But I can live with Romney or potentially even *shudder* McCain. No on Huckabee (so far and the more I see of him the worse my opinion becomes). Those 4 are the only ones with a chance to win obviously.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
So compromise and political expediency is the new black?
Like I responded to Adam C’s post
concerning McCain... I hope were not losing our soul...
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
heh
The editor stripped out my *shudder* before McCain because I used the '<' characters :)
Yes, McCain is troubling but then so is Romney - both have compromised enough. There was a time where I said I would never vote for McCain. I think it illustrates the weakness of the GOP field that after looking at it we say - "well, at least he is somewhat conservative, or at least enough that I can hold my nose and vote for him over the democrat".
It's sad.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
A year ago there was no way
that I was going to vote for Hillary. Now I'll probably vote for her in the Alabama primary, which she will likely win BTW.
qui tacet consentire
why?
What changed your mind about Hillary, and why not Obama or Edwards?
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Hillary has been through the gauntlet
And has come out on the other side still standing. There is a lot to be said for that quality.
Obama will make a great nominee eight years from now. He would also make an excellent choice for vice president.
Edwards I really like and I could very easily vote for him -- and will be glad to do so if he wins the nomination. He has zero chance of winning the Alabama primary, however, because Clinton and Obama have won the endorsements of the two main black political organizations here. Clinton won the really important endorsement -- the Alabama Democratic Conference -- so she's the clear favorite.
qui tacet consentire
I'm not a Republican, but I'll say this:
If I had to vote for a Republican, I don't know who I'd vote for: However, I do know and believe t his:
A) Giuliani, imho, would be an extremely dangerous president, just as much, if not more so than G. W. Bush
B) McCain, who is rather sneaky, is also too much of a loose cannon, which is obvious because he's displayed his rather Vesuvian temper on numerous occasions.
They're both rather dangerous, imo.
Iowa Caucuses, Turnout, and Poll Prognostications
We need to keep this in mind...
I realize, for us political junkies, it’s easy to fall into the trap of applying too much weight and importance to polls. It seems we just can’t wait for the next one to come out that shows our horse in the lead.
While these polls supply limitless fodder for us to quip back and forth we need to be very cautious about prognosticating with said polls, especially in Iowa! Since the great State of Iowa employs the caucus system instead of the primary system it’s important to realize that taking samples for these polls is practically impossible.
There are three million people in Iowa and 2 million registered voters with an estimated 225 thousand expected to actually caucus
State wide the number of Republican caucus participants in this cycle is said to be between 85,000 and 95,000 people depending on the weather! This is extremely small amount of people to first, try and sample and second, to get them to tell you how they are leaning and for whom they will be voting.
For those of you who don’t know exactly how this system works please see the following: Iowa caucus process
The Democratic Party process
is done a bit different but since this was written for TMR I left it out but please see the link becuse it's quite different from the primary process. Dems in Iowa need to go to the caucus with a strong #2 in mind.
Given the way the caucus process in Iowa is structured, with the opportunity for votes to be swayed moments before the vote, it’s easy to recognize that making prognostications from polls days or weeks before the caucus date is really an exercise in futility. Even looking to polls for trends in this process is counterproductive due to the campaigning by influential caucus goer’s minutes before the vote.
So please, I implore you, use caution and be intellectually honest when posting poll results for Iowa because as we’ve seen in the past the so-called poll leaders and front runners usually don’t place as well in Iowa when the shouting is over!
Cross posted from The Minority Report
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777
Polls don't mean much in caucus states
If they did, Howard Dean would have been the 2004 nominee.
Organization and discipline mean a lot more. That's why I predict Hillary and Multiple Choice Mitt will win.
qui tacet consentire
Hillary and Mitt Romney winning?
I'm still undecided, but heaven forbid that Mitt Romney should win!!
He was a disaster as governor of the Bay State.
As for Hillary, I tend to sort of doubt that she'll even win the nomination, since she's a woman.
it's Hillary's race to lose
The choice ofthe party establishment rarely loses -- in either party. She is the clear choice of the establishment.
On the Republican side it is less clear, but I still think Romney's organization will carry the day. I hope I'm wrong because I think Romney is slime. But that's what I see happening.
qui tacet consentire
Happy New Year
Hey ,
Happy New Year to all my Homies on Swords Crossed, you are all a very thoughtful and engaging bunch of political junkies...... and I look forward to a good 2008 with all pistons firing ,,,,,,,,
love y'all
sligowoman
sligowoman
Happy New Year back atchya
And may I say on behalf of the entire state of Alabama (aka the Heart of Dixie) a hearty Roll Tide! and War Eagle!
qui tacet consentire
Happy New Year :)
Thanks for the kind words and I hope it will be a great year!
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Happy New Year to you too, Brendan.
Thanks--here's hoping that the year 2008 will be a better year for all of us.
odd request
anyone here know any Farsi? Or, barring that, any Arabic?
I wanted to get a few words translated into Farsi but the automatic translators they have online all seem to only give you the word written out in Farsi, what I need is an English transliteration of the Farsi word.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I know someone who knows Farsi
Email me your stuff at lodimcmillan at aol.com
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran
Shameless Prediction Update..
I'll put up an update to our shameless predictions we made way back when
..A lot has happened since then, but I'll probably wait until Friday to see how we've done..Oh, and the after-link icons are a neat little addition to the site.
http://wealthweekly.blogspot.com
Wii FC:2805-8311-8040-2678
Brawl: 2277-7051-2186