Happy New Year

Open thread for reflections on 2007, predictions for 2008, and any other random comments.

Comments :

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

happy new year guys!

Just saw the new Des Moines Register poll which shows Obama and Huckabee leading. I don't believe it.

My non-final predictions:

Clinton: 40%
Obama: 34%
Edwards: 26%

Romney: 58%
Huckabee: 42%

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

…………

oh and

I still support Giuliani. But I can live with Romney or potentially even *shudder* McCain. No on Huckabee (so far and the more I see of him the worse my opinion becomes). Those 4 are the only ones with a chance to win obviously.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

…………

So compromise and political expediency is the new black?

Like I responded to Adam C’s post concerning McCain... I hope were not losing our soul...

Adam I have a lot of respect for you and therefore your decision here but I must admit it troubles me.

I hope as conservatives we aren't so obsessed with winning at all costs that we lose our political soul in the process.

Is my view a bit reactionary and overblown, sure, but it does shed light on what I see is an emerging problem in the GOP that's been creeping in on the Party for a while now.

Great things can be accomplished from the minority and losing an election or two by not compromising your principles can strengthen your resolve.

McCain is just too quick to compromise on a host of issues that are near and dear to heart of the Party. From Taxes to immigration and from Kennedy to Feingold, I'm not sure he has what it takes to transition from Senator to President.

Anyway we'll have to see how this plays out. I really hope your wrong here because I can't in good conscious vote for John McCain -- if he wins the nomination I'll be writing in Moe Lane for president.

"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

………… parent

heh

The editor stripped out my *shudder* before McCain because I used the '<' characters :)

Yes, McCain is troubling but then so is Romney - both have compromised enough. There was a time where I said I would never vote for McCain. I think it illustrates the weakness of the GOP field that after looking at it we say - "well, at least he is somewhat conservative, or at least enough that I can hold my nose and vote for him over the democrat".

It's sad.

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

A year ago there was no way

that I was going to vote for Hillary. Now I'll probably vote for her in the Alabama primary, which she will likely win BTW.

qui tacet consentire

………… parent

why?

What changed your mind about Hillary, and why not Obama or Edwards?

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Hillary has been through the gauntlet

And has come out on the other side still standing. There is a lot to be said for that quality.

Obama will make a great nominee eight years from now. He would also make an excellent choice for vice president.

Edwards I really like and I could very easily vote for him -- and will be glad to do so if he wins the nomination. He has zero chance of winning the Alabama primary, however, because Clinton and Obama have won the endorsements of the two main black political organizations here. Clinton won the really important endorsement -- the Alabama Democratic Conference -- so she's the clear favorite.

qui tacet consentire

………… parent

I'm not a Republican, but I'll say this:

If I had to vote for a Republican, I don't know who I'd vote for: However, I do know and believe t his:

A) Giuliani, imho, would be an extremely dangerous president, just as much, if not more so than G. W. Bush

B) McCain, who is rather sneaky, is also too much of a loose cannon, which is obvious because he's displayed his rather Vesuvian temper on numerous occasions.

They're both rather dangerous, imo.

………… parent

Iowa Caucuses, Turnout, and Poll Prognostications

We need to keep this in mind...


I realize, for us political junkies, it’s easy to fall into the trap of applying too much weight and importance to polls. It seems we just can’t wait for the next one to come out that shows our horse in the lead.


While these polls supply limitless fodder for us to quip back and forth we need to be very cautious about prognosticating with said polls, especially in Iowa! Since the great State of Iowa employs the caucus system instead of the primary system it’s important to realize that taking samples for these polls is practically impossible.


There are three million people in Iowa and 2 million registered voters with an estimated 225 thousand expected to actually caucus that’s 1 out of 15 people which is 1 in 10 registered voters.


State wide the number of Republican caucus participants in this cycle is said to be between 85,000 and 95,000 people depending on the weather! This is extremely small amount of people to first, try and sample and second, to get them to tell you how they are leaning and for whom they will be voting.


For those of you who don’t know exactly how this system works please see the following: Iowa caucus process

The Iowa caucus operates very differently from the more common primary election used by most other states (see U.S. presidential primary). The caucus is generally defined as a "gathering of neighbors." Rather than going to polls and casting ballots, Iowans gather at a set location in each of Iowa's 1784 precincts. Typically, these meetings occur in schools, churches, or public libraries. The caucuses are held every two years, but the ones that receive national attention are the presidential preference caucuses held every four years. In addition to the voting, caucus attendees propose planks for their party's platform, select members of the county committees, and discuss issues important to their local organizations.


Unlike the first-in-the-nation New Hampshire primary, the Iowa caucus does not result directly in national delegates for each candidate. Instead, caucus-goers elect delegates to county conventions, who elect delegates to district and state conventions where the national convention delegates are selected.

The Republicans and Democrats each hold their own set of caucuses subject to their own particular rules that change from time to time. Participants in each party's caucuses must be registered with that party. Participants can change their registration at the caucus location. Additionally, 17-year-olds can participate, as long as they will be 18 years old by the date of the general election. Observers are allowed to attend, as long as they do not become actively involved in the debate and voting process.


Republican Party process


For the Republicans, the Iowa caucus follows (and should not be confused with) the Iowa Straw Poll in August of the preceding year. Out of the five Iowa Straw Poll iterations, 1987 is the only year in which the winner of the Iowa Straw Poll has not gone on to win the Iowa caucus.


In the Republican caucuses, each voter casts his or her vote by secret ballot. Voters are presented blank sheets of paper with no candidate names on them. After listening to some campaigning for each candidate by caucus participants, they write their choices down and the Republican Party of Iowa tabulates the results at each precinct and transmits them to the media. The non-binding results are tabulated and reported to the state party which releases the results to the media. Delegates from the precinct caucuses go on to the County Convention, which chooses delegates to the District Convention, which in turn selects delegates to the State Convention. Thus it is the Republican State Convention, not the precinct caucuses, which select the ultimate delegates to the Republican National Convention in Iowa.

The Democratic Party process is done a bit different but since this was written for TMR I left it out but please see the link becuse it's quite different from the primary process. Dems in Iowa need to go to the caucus with a strong #2 in mind.


Given the way the caucus process in Iowa is structured, with the opportunity for votes to be swayed moments before the vote, it’s easy to recognize that making prognostications from polls days or weeks before the caucus date is really an exercise in futility. Even looking to polls for trends in this process is counterproductive due to the campaigning by influential caucus goer’s minutes before the vote.


So please, I implore you, use caution and be intellectually honest when posting poll results for Iowa because as we’ve seen in the past the so-called poll leaders and front runners usually don’t place as well in Iowa when the shouting is over!

Cross posted from The Minority Report

"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
-Thomas Paine: The American Crisis, No. 4, 1777

…………

Polls don't mean much in caucus states

If they did, Howard Dean would have been the 2004 nominee.

Organization and discipline mean a lot more. That's why I predict Hillary and Multiple Choice Mitt will win.

qui tacet consentire

………… parent

Hillary and Mitt Romney winning?

I'm still undecided, but heaven forbid that Mitt Romney should win!!

He was a disaster as governor of the Bay State.

As for Hillary, I tend to sort of doubt that she'll even win the nomination, since she's a woman.

………… parent

it's Hillary's race to lose

The choice ofthe party establishment rarely loses -- in either party. She is the clear choice of the establishment.

On the Republican side it is less clear, but I still think Romney's organization will carry the day. I hope I'm wrong because I think Romney is slime. But that's what I see happening.

qui tacet consentire

………… parent

Happy New Year

Hey ,

Happy New Year to all my Homies on Swords Crossed, you are all a very thoughtful and engaging bunch of political junkies...... and I look forward to a good 2008 with all pistons firing ,,,,,,,,

love y'all

sligowoman

sligowoman

…………

Happy New Year back atchya

And may I say on behalf of the entire state of Alabama (aka the Heart of Dixie) a hearty Roll Tide! and War Eagle!

qui tacet consentire

………… parent

Happy New Year :)

Thanks for the kind words and I hope it will be a great year!

"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR

………… parent

Happy New Year to you too, Brendan.

Thanks--here's hoping that the year 2008 will be a better year for all of us.

…………

odd request

anyone here know any Farsi? Or, barring that, any Arabic?

I wanted to get a few words translated into Farsi but the automatic translators they have online all seem to only give you the word written out in Farsi, what I need is an English transliteration of the Farsi word.

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

I know someone who knows Farsi

Email me your stuff at lodimcmillan at aol.com

"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge" -- Kahlil Gibran

………… parent

Shameless Prediction Update..

I'll put up an update to our shameless predictions we made way back when ..A lot has happened since then, but I'll probably wait until Friday to see how we've done..Oh, and the after-link icons are a neat little addition to the site.

http://wealthweekly.blogspot.com
Wii FC:2805-8311-8040-2678
Brawl: 2277-7051-2186

…………