Tuesday Open Thread
Health care spending to top $4 trillion by 2017 - of course Dems will all tell you that our entitlements are just fine and in no need of reform. No need to slow down the rate of growth or rethink how we can do this without steep tax hikes.
Clinton ups attacks - I won't count her out just yet, but it's getting mighty close. If she loses Texas on March 4th, it's over.
Have a great Tuesday!
Submitted by Ender on Tue, 2008-02-26 10:18
Tags:

Comments :
Why does this seem almost incestuous to me?
Well, maybe it isn't incest, but they certainly do seem like two peas in a pod. Still, let me wish the couple good luck.
They are going to have
some seriously pasty-skinned children.
Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce
My gaydar may not be the best tuned
but there is no way that guy is having children without some machine being involved.
Look at the picture of them walking together.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Or...
Health care spending to top $4 trillion by 2017 - of course Reps will all tell you that our privatized healthcare system is just fine and in no need of reform.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Sarah Silverman and Matt Damon and Jimmy Kimmel and Ben Affleck
I had missed this until my wife pointed it out.
and Kimmel's response:
You know, Silverman is definitely cute but goddamn would you have to have a thick skin to date her.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
that was pretty funny :)
Thanks man.
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Most excellent! Thanks.
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4Love it.
Kimmel's had to go that far in order not to be a weak retread. We had a good laugh over it last night.
Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce
Primo
qui tacet consentire
My sister went to the Clapton/Winwood show at MS Garden
last night. I just read an e-mail she had sent me from her Blackberry stating she was inside and waiting for the show to begin. She's funny. She wondered why the crowd seemed so OLD!
For those of you who are unfamiliar with that pairing and like rock, run out (don't walk) and buy the Blind Faith self titled album (oops! sorry, showing my age again), CD or better yet the two disk Re-masterd version. Can't Find My Way Home is worth it by itself.
Oh yea...I told her I was completely jealous.
Isn't this a great
I love this nifty trick of fear mongering on health care costs, when in the last seven years the cost of health care has nearly doubled....... then screaming OMG it's so expensive.
OR: First double health care costs , then claim medicare is an unaffordable drain on the govt's budget.
I'm only half stupid
Another reason to elect Hussein Obama X as Supreme Leader of
Crackerland. This is the funniest twist on a political controversy I've seen lately
. Special bonus points for:
"Hussein X’s first act in office should be to free Mumia and appoint him as the first official Secretary of the Kill Whitey Department."
That's offensive
and not at all funny.
Why would you even dignify this by linking to it.
I'm only half stupid
Because it is extremely funny, in a SadlyNo way.
Offensive? Sarcasm is now offensive? Especially when the sarcasm is making fun of those who are portraying this as an actual issue?
Your meters need recalibration. Don't take everything so seriously.
I don't find sarcasm promoting violence
in this particular situation even remotely funny, due to the explosively racial and religous aspect involved. Why is that funny or appropriate.
(Secretary of the K**l Whitey Department) My meter does not need to be recalibrated in regards to this comment.
Otherwise, sarcasm is usually great fun.
I'm only half stupid
We disagree. But out of respect I won't link to today's
SadlyNo follow up. Not so much because it is just as caustic/sarcastic. More because I'm not trying to push anyones buttons here and....it just isn't as funny as yesterdays.
But I will link to the SF Chronicles Don Asmussen's Bad Reporter
in which he makes fun of more Obama photo's to strike fear into the voting public.
I heard a caller to a radio show today
who actually said that Obama is not really a Christian because he never says the word Christ and doesn't say Merry Christmas. He also said that Obama thinks he's Black Jesus and is actually the Antichrist.
Now, how can someone be Black Jesus but not a Christian? Or how can you be Black Jesus but also the Antichrist? These morons need to make up their minds.
qui tacet consentire
let's dissect this logically
Obama thinking that he's Black Jesus, does not actually make him Black Jesus, nor does it make the caller think that Obama is Black Jesus. Therefore it frees the caller to think that Obama is not a Christian and is actually the Antichrist because it was Obama and not the caller who thought that Obama is the Black Jesus.
Moron? Perhaps but not for the reasons you provide :)
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
El Wrongo!
If Obama thinks he's Black Jesus, then it stands to reason he would be a Christian because he would want to be a member of the religion that worships him. And if Obama thinks he's Black Jesus then why would he even consider becoming the Antichrist? That would be like being matter and antimatter simultaneously.
qui tacet consentire
So the most logical conclusion is ...
Obama actually IS the Antichrist. This allows him to pretend to be the Black Jesus but NOT be a Christian. Right? :)
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4I don't want the Black Jesus.
I want the Buddy Christ!
Seriously, can't you see Buddy Christ and Buddha smoking a doob and watching Wizard of OZ to Pink Floyd while waiting for Mohammed and Krishna to get back with the chips and dip for Poker night?
Buddy Christ, F&^% Yeah!
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
He looks like a car salesman
Would you buy a car from this messiah?
qui tacet consentire
He can turn water into alcohol
Damn straight I'll buy that car.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
That is a fun movie though.
I like how Jesus' General has photoshopped it for his own now.
Carlin as a Cardinal was inspired. -nt.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Hey, Brendan
As per...well...several discussions both here and at the Forvm on Obama...especially with Bernard, I saw this article this morning
and thought of you.
So, I thought you might want to read it.
I'm not going to call Obama the second coming of Lou Dobbs and never have...yet...I do think and have always thought that you give him a little too much slack on this matter.
Luckily for him, there are bigger fish to fry...
My wild speculation ....
In his book, Obama said that he felt that CAFTA was a net positive economically, but he voted against it to make a point about protecting the American worker. Reading between the lines, you could get the impression that the anti-CAFTA vote was an opening that he saw down the road politically to differentiate himself from Clinton (and he's used it lately as a weapon.) It wouldn't surprise me at all if President Obama would vote differently than Senator Obama in matters such as trade. But, I can't read his mind, maybe he is just another protectionist.
http://www.theotherpaper.com/top2-21/substory1.htm
Does Obama believe what he says re: NAFTA?
Good: Obama may believe in free trade.
Bad: If he does, he feels the need to deceive people about his support in order to get the nomination.
http://belowthebeltway.com/2008/02/28/obama-staffer-to-canada-just-ignore-our-anti-nafta-rhetoric/
I wrote up a biofeedback diary. -nt.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
National Review gets ripped a new one
by amerciablog:
Nice to see the deep racism of the GOP base on proud (goosestepping) parade.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Ugh, what an ugly piece.
There certainly were interracial couplings consecrated by the extreme left (hey, at least they supported it, unlike the racist rest-of-country), but to then make a barely tenable argument about the "possibility" that a particular interracial coupling was the product of Communism is pretty dumb even for that rag.
As if the most famous interracial couple
of that period had anything to do with Communism. Fun fact: that couple was married in 1958, same year as Obama's parents.
Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce
What about Capt. Kirk and Lt. Uhura?
Of course, the United Federation of Planets was sort of a utopian society that didn't use money. Real pinko stuff.
qui tacet consentire
Gun Free Zones are the targets of choice for Mass Murderers.
Well the grand social experiment known as Gun Free Zones is lining up to confirm what gun owners have said all along: when you disarm the law abiding only the criminals will have guns. A look at the most recent series of mass murders reveals that these Gun Free Zones have become the target of choice among mass murderers and most likely for the obvious reasons.
Save a Victim! Abolish Gun Free Zones Today!
For a brief perspective on the issue, here is a piece by John Lott, Jr.
What are others saying on this issue? Here is a google search
.
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4Foul!
Weak piece. If it were intellectually honest, it would at least try to address the mass murders that take place in areas where guns aren't banned, or the overwhelming lack of mass murders in places where they are (see below) . By leaving that out, there's no way for me as an uninformed reader to judge whether the author is on to something, or whether he's just picking the evidence most convenient to his thesis.
Arguing that the shootings at places like Virginia Tech are evidence that gun-free zones don't work is pretty absurd. In the last ten years, there have been roughly 10 cases of college shooters. That's about 1 per year. There are something like 5,000+ institutions of higher learning in the United States. 1/5,000? Are those the odds you want in your court when it comes to arguing that something is a failed policy?
Besides, there's something perversely tautological about his argument: killing sprees tend to take place where people are congregating in close quarters (which is why multiple people get killed), and most places where people congregate in close quarters tend to ban weapons.
Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce
No foul IMHO, just on topic.
I guess you missed this part:
These are examples of places where mass murderers have been thwarted or the damage minimized BECAUSE people were allowed to carry (i.e. where guns aren't banned). So he does mention such cases.
This is not likely to be an exhaustive list of cases where mass murder was committed/attempted. So you have a fair point if any examples where the mass murders occurred in "Guns Permitted Zones" AND no armed civilian stopped the attacker actually exist. Do you have some to offer up? I don't claim that none exist but personally I can't think of any that occurred since the Gun Free Zone idea took off ... which is kind of the point.
If you can come up with some examples we can discuss the implications thereof.
Absolutely, especially when you consider that there are probably fewer than 10 such cases which occur in "Gun Permitted Zones" AND that there are probably thousands or even millions of times as many such places around in society. For the sake of discussion, let's assume that there are just as many such cases in the "Gun Permitted Zones" each year as in the Gun Free Zones and that the ratio of "Gun Permitted Zones" to Gun Free Zones is on the low end of like 1,000 to 1.
This would mean that the comparable statistic for the Gun Permitted Zones is 1/5,000,000+ making it 1,000 times more likely to have such an incident in a Gun Free Zone as in a Gun Permitted Zone, right? Couple that with the fact that the number of victims in such incidents is likely higher in the case of Gun Free Zones vs. the "Gun Permitted Zones" and the case becomes even stronger.
A keen observation on your part. Let us review the implications:
Implication? We are disarming the innocent victims where they most need the benefit of being armed. Yep, that makes sense ... NOT!
Even so, my point (not Lott's actually), is that Gun Free Zones have become the target of choice for mass murderers for the very reasons you cite above.
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4Meh
Meh. Your implication is a function of your attitude going into the argument. One could just as easily imply that we are creating Gun Free Zones exactly where they are most needed, by preventing weapons from entering the areas where killing sprees are most likely to occur.
We are the environment. There is no distinction. What we do to the earth we do to ourselves. —David Suzuki
Well then ...
the fact that these incidents continue unabated indicates that the policy is a failure at its intended purpose, and given that the victims have now been disarmed and rendered helpless the policy is not only a failure but has been shown to be counter productive to boot! :)
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4Actually, you aren't arguing "unabated"
because you're discussing two different subsets. If you look at what you've discussed above, you agreed with me on two points:
1. areas where people congregate densely are more likely to be the setting for mass killings (otherwise they wouldn't be mass, obviously), and
2. areas where people congregate densely are more likely to be designated as gun-free zones.
So when you argue that there are thousands upon thousands more places that aren't gun-free, you're actually addressing a different subset entirely: the total available public spaces in the country. But we've already agreed that mass murders generally don't take place there, as per 1.
Point 2 doesn't involve complete overlap, so you're going to have a margin of places that are densely populated but not gun-free, or gun-free but not densely populated, but is either statistically significant here?
I can Venn diagram it if you want, but really you're trying to apply the lack of mass murders in non-gun-free zones by using an unrelated subset; the fact is we don't have a comparative subset for comparison (that is, a significant number of densely populated, non-gun-free zones in areas with an otherwise similar crime profile). To argue that gun-free zones are a failure, you'd have to find some way of either extrapolating what the gun violence would look like if they weren't gun-free zones (difficult, and kinda sketchy) or compare it to something similar enough not to balk at the comparison (also difficult, also kinda sketchy).
When it comes down to it, both sides (mine included) are just making arguments based on what we feel is best. The so-called evidence isn't very helpful either way.
Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce
Your argument lacks intelligence.
You are suggesting that we should tell every college student out there that they should go to all school events and classes packing heat.
If that were to take place, there would be more deaths, not less.
Your strawman lacks intelligence.
If he [begin Wizard of Oz music] only had a brain ... :)
"Allowing concealed carry" does NOT equate to "tell[ing] every college student out there that they should go to all school events and classes packing heat." So I suggested no such thing.
On the other hand, "telling every college student out there that they CAN'T carry a concealed weapon" DOES equate to "telling every college student out there that they HAVE to be a helpless victim" as well as "telling every potential mass murderer out there that college students are easy prey."
Well, here is some evidence that tends to refute your assertion:
Do you have any evidence that actually supports your assertion?
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4My objection was no strawman, it was directly from you.
You suggest that more college students should be armed and then there would be fewer shooting deaths.
I directly called your argument utter bullshit.
Hillary's Presidential ambitions are now toast.
According to this TPM link, Obama has now tied Hillary in Texas
. Since she HAD to win Texas AND Ohio (and every state after that) to win the delegates she'd need to be nominated, it just appears that it won't happen.
I think she should run till after the 3/4/08 primaries and then graciously conceed the race. Actually, I think that's exactly what she'll do.
New York is about to gain a new (same old) Senator (again). Reminds me of that Who line in Baba O'Riely: "Welcome to the new boss. Same as the old boss."
On the other hand, the right wing machine will be crying in their martini's tonight. Hillary was their dream almost come true.
More accurately:
they appear to be toast. A poll is not a vote. Hold off on sending the funeral flowers until after next Tuesday (a week is a long time in primary season).
Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce
I stand properly corrected.
Muchas gracias.
Looking at the green papers
neither Ohio nor Texas is a winner take all state. Both apportion up the majority of their delegates by who wins in each district (congressional for Ohio, senatorial for Texas, ever the oddball).
Polls have Obama and Clinton close which means a few things due to the apportionment-
1) Clinton can't squeak out a 50.1% win and credibly call that a big win because she will be splitting the delegates.
2) Clinton or Obama might lose the overall vote but get more delegates because of the funky way apportionments work. If that happens it might get a bit ugly in the aftermath.
Assuming the recent polling is in the neighborhood, Clinton is probably finished. It might not be clean or neat though.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Ya know that Alabama ex-gov Don Siegelman 60 minutes
Show report? I didn't know that As 60 Minutes was putting its show together, the White House put pressure on CBS -- the parent company -- to kill the show.
Not only that but:
"If you recall, Ms. Simpson testified, under oath, to Congress about Karl Rove's involvement in politicizing the DOJ. What you may not know, however, is that her house mysteriously caught fire and she was run off the road in the weeks leading up to her testimony."
The bush43 Administration is no different than a Soviet era Premier, no different than a 2nd world dictatorship. When Obama wins the Presidency, I pray that he completely opens up all the books to show us all what a vile bunch of tyrants and mafiosos that bushco was.
Great Digby update:
"The Attorney General, by the way, has said he would rather let the case go through the normal appeals process rather than open an investigation."
except:
" It has been 20 months since Siegelman’s trial ended and no trial transcript has been produced by Fuller's court. This is in violation of the rules of criminal procedure which require a transcript within 30 days of sentencing. Siegelman can't appeal his conviction with out an official trial transcript."
Gee, how could THAT happen?
Also, the local TV station
that was supposed to air it mysteriously had a ""blackout"
during the time the segment ran:
Hmm?
We are all mediators, translators. - Derrida
What is America now? Some 3rd world nation that let's
it's leaders cheat, lie, plunder and pillage their own treasury and resources? That's what this has all gotten me thinking. Wrt the current administration, their actions have answered yes, yes, yes and yes unfortunately. But now we also have to add arsonists and strong armed enforcement to that list too. That and second rate censorship by compliant corporate cronies.
You know, the last couple of weeks that dubya is in office, his entire time will be taken up issuing Presidential Pardons and Executive Orders. Now, the Executive Orders can be overturned the very first day by new directives from the new President. The Presidential Pardons....nothing can be done to take them away. Am I right about that? Anyone here have a better legal grasp than me?
Food prices
One of the few things worth reading on Redstate in recent weeks has been economic updates by blackhedd. They're usually rather interesting- although a bit scary. So here's his latest:
Wheat Prices Hit Record High
Bugger.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Yeah,
ethanol....great idea. not.
No argument here
but I'm not sure it is the cause of this.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
sure it is
It's a major factor. Clear as day.
Yea, Corn is used for ethanol. Wheat doesn't have the
sugar. Still.....
We could buy ethanol cheaper from Brazil, but some lobby somewhere won't "let" the administration do it. I'm thinking that would be the corn and chemical companies industries.
Wheats costs have more to do with oil. Fertilizer, pesticide & transportation costs are all up significantly.
But what do I know? I want all cars to run on electric motors, not combustion engines. I'm just waiting for that 400 mile battery.
Ethanol
Actually, I'm pretty sure the spike in wheat prices is at least partially a result of the whole ethanol thing. More farms are switching over to growing corn because of the new demand, so there is less wheat being grown.
I am told that this is also the reason for the increasing price of black oil sunflower seeds, which has caused my birdfeeding habit to become more costly!
We are the environment. There is no distinction. What we do to the earth we do to ourselves. —David Suzuki
It's ethanol
In the immediate, there's was a bad harvest in Australia due to drought but the supply was already super tight due to high corn prices causing a shift in land use from wheat to more corn.
It's basic stuff. I saw this coming for a while now. I'm in the food business....trust me.
That presumes
that Wheat and Corn can be grown interchangably, which according to some of the posters in the RS thread is not the case. I have no first hand experience with farming but I'd want to see some hard data that said it was ethanol and not, say, the various extreme climates or something else at work.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Both have an effect
I believe corn and wheat are often rotated crops on the same fields year-to-year, so they can definitely be grown in the same conditions as each other.
Weather
has certainly also had an effect on prices, which is why I said ethanol is partially responsible.
We are the environment. There is no distinction. What we do to the earth we do to ourselves. —David Suzuki
Out here in CA
many farmers sow wheat in the winter and harvest it in the spring, then grow corn in the summer.
Ethanol is shifting the commodities markets.
But again, if we can get ethanol from a foreign source cheaper than we can make it here, why aren't we?
Ask Uncle Sam
We have something called sugar subsidies which give an incredible blanket of protection to sugar companies in the US.
It's hard to say what the total effects would be if the subsidy was lifted. Yes, sugar imports would sky-rocket and the cost of sugar in this country would plummet. But it's a little hazy to figure what the domestic sugar industry would look like. Some companies would fail...others would innovate and regain an advantage through natural and competitive means.
Of course, none of this will ever happen. Agriculture in general and sugar most of all is heavily subsidized and protected in this country. Non-farmers as a group (some 99%+ of the population) are simply not organized and passionate enough about countering these policies.
And it's area's like this that I tend to lean libertarian.
Yea, sugar is a great example. The US pays double and triple what the world price of sugar is. The refiners would go out of business probably. That or they would buy up plants in other countries. The farmers would just switch to growing something else.
I can see a need to have the market protected where it's a commodity that has some strategic national interest. I don't think sugar or ethanol rise to that level.
I think there are certain subsidies
that can make sense. For example subsidies that help protect farmers from disasterous seasons can work as a sort of insurance policy for the nation. We don't want farms going out of business just beause there was bad weather. Food is a critical industry, along with energy, communication, and transportation. Those represent non-optional products. Without those the country collapses. So protecting those industries prudently is a good idea.
There are also a lot of subsidies that are useless and should be cut. The goal should be to maintain the commodity, not the particular vendor.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
And I'm all for helping Ag out with insurance costs.
But I don't like market subsidies. You always end up favoring one group over another that way. Most of the times nowdays it seems like subsidies favor the huge Ag concerns. I just think it's the wrong way to get prices in line with what you may want.
The biggest problem we have out here in CA right now is farmland being turned into subdivisions. The whole state is gonna be one giant Orange County in 40 years.
I'll be gone when that happens. I like Ag being part of the mix. I'm willing to protect it (the land) more than I am the individual commodity.
ha
Good luck with that one. But it sounds nice, doesn't it? :)
Food is critical
yes. and so are other industries that we don't protect and have the goods from in in abundance....clothes, electronics, appliances, cars etc etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. and etc.
Protecting our food supply is a sophistic reason. It simply doesn't hold up logically. America will also have a food supply...both domestic and foreign with or without subsidies. The question is at what cost, at what prices and with what technologies. Subsidies simply don't make sense and keep land and resources from optimal usage as well as de-incentivizing innovation of newer methods, technologies and ancillary services...like disaster insurance.
Whatever argument was used to justify such policies during the great depression, they simply have no bearing on modern times....and have had no real bearing at all for a long, long time.
Kindness is right and it warms my heart to that distinction made about "market subsidies". We can debate other kinds but market subsidies should have universal opposition.
Critical?
How are appliances and electronics critical? They may be major segments of our economy, but by critical I mean literally that the state falls apart without them- food, because there is no state if everyone is dead, transportation, because without the ability to move goods and people around there effectively is no state just isolated communities, communication, because the flow of info is as critical as the flow of goods and people, and electricity, because it has become a ubiquitous requirement for basically every aspect of our lives.
That's not an assumption to make blithely. There are very real easily imaginable scenarios where the world food supply becomes critically constrained. In that case countries that produce food will not export. Countries that do not produce food will literally suffer mass starvation.
How does disaster insurance do that?
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I don't disagree
that a lot of subsidies end up being poorly thought out, badly implemented, and or counterproductive. I'd be very happy to get rid of the vast majority of them. I just don't agree that there's no good use for a government subsidy.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Brendan?
Haven't seen anything from him for a while. Anyone know if he's at the hospital?
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I've got my fingers crossed and a prayer spoken.
It's his wife that has to do all the work!
GOP hoisted upon their own retard
This stuff has been floating around for a couple weeks now. But we get some new details.
My favorite:
Nice touch. (emphasis added)
(Yes the title is intentional)
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I liked the catch line "At least they're consistent."
and at least it's with their own damn money, not mine for a change.
SC Meeting in SL Wednesday night
We will be meeting in Second Life tomorrow, Wednesday night, beginning at 5:30pm Pacific time.
(Edit: I remodeled my plot, so expect things to look different when you arrive)
The Swords Crossed group has 46 member so far and I thought maybe I'd start posting a few photos of 'em. Meetings average about a dozen folks, with lots of newcomers and a few regulars. Here's one, who reads and has registered here on the blog, and who is truly tons of fun at the meetings. She's a proud idealistic liberal from the Pacific Northwest rooting for Obama. Missliberties, you'd like her!
Introducing Audrey Marx.
Thanks for thinking of me PF!
I just don't have the time to invest in an alternate reality.
Audrey Marx looks way cool
Love the cig the tatoos and the nonchalant pose.
I could be her twin brother in SL, Alexander Marx.
I'm only half stupid
My work is so geeky
I just got an official email telling me one of the really big business organizations is having a Wii tournament between the various business groups.
Like with prizes and everything.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Sounds like fun.
Geeky goodness.
As an utter nerd, exactly what is a Wii tournament?
I'm only half stupid
The Wii is a gaming console
like the playstation 3 or the Xbox 360. It's put out by Nintendo.
In this case the tournament consists of playing certain games on the Wii. I think they were all sports games just for a bit of irony- geeks playing sports on a video game console.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
That's the best
way for geeks to play sports isn't it...... virtually. You can be a lean mean fighting machine, no matter if you wear coke bottle glasses.
I hope you kick some serious a** with your fingertips.
I'm only half stupid
I won't be "competing"
In the first place I loathe sports games (never do virtually something you could do in real life). In the second I refuse to touch the Wii, based purely on the name.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Succumb to the Wii's awesomeness!
I avoided it for a while for the same reasons, although I knew I'd eventually check it out (for Zelda and Metroid, my two favorite video game series). But it's the sports games that ended up hooking me, even though I've never shown any desire to play them in the past. Wii sports is such an excellent combination of fluidity, goofiness, and physical exertion that it's actually a lot of fun. We have regular tournaments with friends now.
But if you were ever the Zelda/Metroid type, those games are first-class. Mario Galaxy as well, which tripped me out (I love it!)
Incidentally, the wii's become popular in nursing homes for some basic exercise.
Saint, n. A dead sinner revised and edited. - Ambrose Bierce
I'll say the same thing I say
when friends beg me to play Guitar Hero or Rockstar:
no.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Zelda was my first love
Legend of Zelda was the first video game that ever consumed my life for a brief period of time. Lost hours to that game!
My nephews have a Wii, and there is definitely some fun in there.
We are the environment. There is no distinction. What we do to the earth we do to ourselves. —David Suzuki
Hours? Amateur. :)
Civilization I sometimes played for days at a sitting. I shudder to think of the time invested.
...and damn, Ghandi! (Due to some bugs in his AI, Ghandi was easily the most treacherous bloodthirsty world leader. I *always* nuked his ass as soon as I developed the tech).
I can't buy civ 4 or even 3, because I'm afraid of dropping all my various projects and becoming a total recluse...
I never played Zelda. In fact I didn't play any console games until a couple years when I got a PS2 and Xbox (they were finally cheap enough I didn't feel bad getting them).
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Self healing rubber
fun:
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Seems like that kind of day
The very first concert I ever went to was B52s Cosmic Thing Tour bak in 89 (I was in middle school).
For such a silly band they had some very interesting musical stylings. Follow Your Bliss is kind of odd for the B52s. Almost all of their songs feature Fred doing mainly spoken word vocals while Kate and Cindy harmonize. FYB is an instrumental. It also has a much more subdued almost maudlin sound. This from the band that recorded "Love Shack", "Quiche Lorraine", and "Rock Lobster". Still I've always thought it was rather pretty.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
This is sick
Does anyone doubt that if such a device targetted any group but kids that it would be found immediately illegal? What the hell are people thinking using a device that causes physical pain to herd kids? Why not just hit them with a good old fashioned cattle prod?
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
W.F.Buckley, founder of National Review, dies
story
I got to admit I feel a little bad for Buckley. The last few years it seemed pretty clear he was horrified by what had become of the movement he was so intimately tied to. I have no great love for the man or his works but its a pity his last years had to be witness to the flaming destruction of principles he held dear by the people carrying his banner.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
the Turkey situation continues to boil
Turkey has military forces in northern Iraq, effectively invading the Kurdish areas to go after the support for kurdish terrorist groups that operate in Turkey.
story
So it looks like the Peshmerga may be getting involved, and we may have open warfare between a US NATO ally and a part of Iraq, which is under US occupation.
What will the US do? We could come to the aid of the Kurds, afterall they've been our supposed success story in Iraq so afar. But that means opposing Turkey which would be hard. Alternately we could play another round of betray the ally and throw the Kurds to the dogs, hoping that we can now keep baghdad from exploding and use it as our example of success. I suspect the Iraqi government as a whole can be relied upon to twiddle their thumbs, both because that's all they seem to do anyway and because the shia and sunni have no love of the kurds anyway.
That in action might change if the Turks start hitting Kirkuk (although it's pretty far inland). Iran has their own animosity towards the Kurds but I'd guess they'll just sit back and enjoy the show while their own hands remain clean.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.