Real Plans, Real Proposals

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Sounds too good to be true...

Took a peek over at the website. I think it sounds great if it was implementable. I think the "your choice" idea is a good idea. Let the taxpayer decide things like:

- whether they want to pay the flat tax plan above or the current tax

- whether to allocate a portion of their Social Security into PRAs or to leave it in the SS plan altogether.

And having the choice to buy medical insurance across state lines is a "duh" move to me. I pay (currently) about $55 per pay check (twice a month) for insurance (with no co-pays). I think this is good. But if I could get similar coverage options and offers from another state, I think it could be beneficial. When states know that they can charge in-state customers anything they want because customers can't go across state lines, then costs will just go up, up, up.

However, I'd be worried that we wouldn't be able to pay for all this because the congressfolk get inside the Beltway Matrix and decide all that money they get should go to their pet projects. The we have no money to fund such programs. I applaud his approaches but question the ability to implement these programs.

It's the Contract With America all over again. and we know how that went. favicon

__________________________

http://wealthweekly.blogspot.com
Wii FC:2805-8311-8040-2678
Brawl: 2277-7051-2186

…………

Hell no.

That plan is god awful

1) doesn't eliminate for profit insurance and hence doesn't eliminate the biggest problem with our current system. All it does is turn more power over to companies that have proven unethical.

2) Yeah let's take a safety net and turn it into a game of craps. Then when the majority of people blow thier safety net on bad investments we'll...what? I guess create a new SS to do what the old one used to. The problem with SS is not that people don;t get to take it to vegas and gamble it away. The main problem is that SS has run a surplus for decades that the government was supposed to leave alone and yet they didn't.

3) Yeah at a time when the income disparity is growin catastrophically we really need to change the tax system to be hideously more regressive. No, thanks, really.

The only thing he suggests that's worth anything is reforming the AMT. And that's basically just a given.

__________________________

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

…………

+1

With respect to the AMT, it should be indexed to inflation. It should apply to anyone in the upper .1% or so.

__________________________

I didn't break the law; I am the law! -- George W. Bush Judge Dredd
I'm listening to... favicon

………… parent

Ryan's tax plan is a joke

Promotes saving by eliminating taxes on interest, capital gains, and dividends; also
eliminates the death tax.

  1. Is there solid evidence that these taxes discourage savings? I suspect the answer is "no".
  2. I am bothered by the prospect of trust-fund babies paying no taxes while everyone else foots the bills.
  3. Anyone who uses the term "death tax" is insulting my intelligence.
__________________________

"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas favicon

…………

He's a total 180 from me

I'd actually do exactly the opposite.

I'd increase taxes on interest, capital gains, and dividends while decrease or, in a perfect world, eliminate taxes on labor outside FICA.

__________________________

I didn't break the law; I am the law! -- George W. Bush Judge Dredd
I'm listening to... favicon

………… parent