Hat tip to Arnold Kling .
Congress Paul Ryan has a new policy package up for others to see called America's Road Map
The PDF bullet point version here .
Interesting. I commend him on the effort. This isn't about vague generalities but quite specific.
As Ryan says:
It is a real plan, with real proposals, real numbers to back them, and real legislation to implement it. Based on the analysis of government actuaries, this plan is projected to make the Social Security and Medicare programs permanently solvent. It will lift the growing debt burden on future generations, and hold Federal taxes to 18.5% of GDP.
Let's have a look...
He highlights three major areas for policy changes:
1. Health and retirement security
2. National Debt Burden
3. Jobs and Competitiveness
Major Components:
1. Health Care
Ensures universal access to affordable health insurance by restructuring the tax
code, allowing all Americans to secure an affordable health plan that best suits their needs, and
shifts the ownership of health coverage away from the government and employers to individuals.
So far, so good. I like the general idea. Make it so everyone can buy it and individualize it. Your employment does not govern your insurance. It's YOURS. Like car insurance. Transparency measures are also included.
He proposes a tax credit of $2500 for individuals and $5000 for families. Insurance can be purchases from ANYWHERE. That is big change already. Currently, most insurance policies must be purchased in state and hurts competitive pricing and choice. The program also leaves more maximum flexibility to states to tailor to their needs.
For Medicare, it leaves the system alone for those over 55 and for the under 55 it follows the same pattern as regular health care but with a $9500 payment and additional help for lower income recipients (inflation adjustable) and it's also risk adjustable for greater assistance to higher risk people. It also establishes tax free medical savings accounts.
The key points here are choice, individual empowerment, transparency and solvency...which it accomplishes.
2. Social Security
Preserves system for those over 55.
for the under 55 it achieves real solvency and:
"Offers workers under 55 the option of investing over one third of their current Social
Security taxes into personal retirement accounts, similar to the Thrift Savings Plan
available to Federal employees. Includes a property right so they can pass on these assets
to their heirs, and a guarantee that total benefits from the personal accounts will not be
less than they would have been under the current system."
The changes seem subtle but it makes a big difference and with borrowing for transition costs. Details are a little murky here.
3. Tax reform
Eliminates AMT and offers tax payers a choice of paying through the existing system or a simplified, no deduction (minus health care credit) 2 rate system that anyone can fill out like a postcard.
"Simplified tax rates are 10% on income up to $100,000 for joint filers, and $50,000 for
single filers; and 25% on taxable income above these amounts. Also includes a generous
standard deduction and personal exemption (totaling $39,000 for a family of four)."
I like it. It speaks for itself. Flatter, simpler, much, much lower and has a generous deduction. An excellent improvement for everyone regardless of income.
It also eliminates taxes on interest, capital gains, and dividends; also
eliminates the death tax and replaces the corporate income tax with a "border-adjustable business consumption tax" of 8.5%. Not sure what that is but I like the lower rate. :)
This will do wonders for cutting into artificially tax inflated prices and distortions while leaving everyone from top to bottom a lot more money in their pocket.
That's an overview. I think it's pretty good. We'll see how it stands up to detailed vetting.
__________________________
Sounds too good to be true...
Took a peek over at the website. I think it sounds great if it was implementable. I think the "your choice" idea is a good idea. Let the taxpayer decide things like:
- whether they want to pay the flat tax plan above or the current tax
- whether to allocate a portion of their Social Security into PRAs or to leave it in the SS plan altogether.
And having the choice to buy medical insurance across state lines is a "duh" move to me. I pay (currently) about $55 per pay check (twice a month) for insurance (with no co-pays). I think this is good. But if I could get similar coverage options and offers from another state, I think it could be beneficial. When states know that they can charge in-state customers anything they want because customers can't go across state lines, then costs will just go up, up, up.
However, I'd be worried that we wouldn't be able to pay for all this because the congressfolk get inside the Beltway Matrix and decide all that money they get should go to their pet projects. The we have no money to fund such programs. I applaud his approaches but question the ability to implement these programs.
It's the Contract With America all over again. and we know how that went.
__________________________http://wealthweekly.blogspot.com
Wii FC:2805-8311-8040-2678
Brawl: 2277-7051-2186
Hell no.
That plan is god awful
1) doesn't eliminate for profit insurance and hence doesn't eliminate the biggest problem with our current system. All it does is turn more power over to companies that have proven unethical.
2) Yeah let's take a safety net and turn it into a game of craps. Then when the majority of people blow thier safety net on bad investments we'll...what? I guess create a new SS to do what the old one used to. The problem with SS is not that people don;t get to take it to vegas and gamble it away. The main problem is that SS has run a surplus for decades that the government was supposed to leave alone and yet they didn't.
3) Yeah at a time when the income disparity is growin catastrophically we really need to change the tax system to be hideously more regressive. No, thanks, really.
The only thing he suggests that's worth anything is reforming the AMT. And that's basically just a given.
__________________________I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
+1
With respect to the AMT, it should be indexed to inflation. It should apply to anyone in the upper .1% or so.
__________________________I didn't break the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...
Ryan's tax plan is a joke
- Is there solid evidence that these taxes discourage savings? I suspect the answer is "no".
- I am bothered by the prospect of trust-fund babies paying no taxes while everyone else foots the bills.
- Anyone who uses the term "death tax" is insulting my intelligence.
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
He's a total 180 from me
I'd actually do exactly the opposite.
I'd increase taxes on interest, capital gains, and dividends while decrease or, in a perfect world, eliminate taxes on labor outside FICA.
__________________________I didn't break the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...