The Audacity of Arrogance
Joel S. Hirschhorn
Anyone who doubts the downside of hubris should think of the losing campaign of Hillary Clinton. Like cholesterol in arteries, extreme arrogance can block seeing political realities.
And Barack Obama is exhibiting horrendous hubris by, for example, flip-flopping on his pledge to use federal campaign financing for the general election, and for displaying an Obama seal in public events that closely resembles the official presidential seal.
Welcome to the audacity of arrogance.
But there is a lot more to this Age of Hubris.
At least 20 percent of Americans are on top of the economic ladder. Some 60 million people are not suffering because of high gasoline prices, are driving around in expensive $40,000+ cars, are living in sumptuous McMansions and vacation homes, have good health insurance, and are shopping in expensive stores and eating in luxurious restaurants that continue to do gangbuster business. They keep buying the most expensive products ever made available in human history. This elitist Upper Class benefits from the two-party plutocracy that through government policies takes care of them because the wealthy take of politicians. It is very likely that the vast majority of Obama’s small donors are part of this Upper Class.
About 3 million of these people comprise the super-rich that fly around the globe in private jets and are driven around in limousines, live in enormous well guarded homes costing tens of millions of dollars, and vacation on their yachts and private islands. They are members of the ruling plutocracy.
Meanwhile, the remaining 240 million Americans are suffering in a multitude of ways: millions lack health insurance and care, millions lack adequate food and shelter, millions more face economic insecurity and pain as they cope with extremely expensive gas and mounting food prices even as they increasingly recognize that enjoyable retirement is a disappearing dream and possible job loss puts them one step away from personal bankruptcy. With rising economic inequality, the vast majority of Americans are hurting, which explains why 84 percent say the country is on the wrong track.
So here is the logical question: Are all the rich and affluent Americans feeling nervous and increasingly afraid that their physical security may be increasingly at risk? Are they beginning to think about millions of suffering and furious Americans rising up in violent revolution against the status quo political and economic system? Are they thinking about the millions of angry Americans who own guns? Are they remembering that in human history economic slaves have risen up to openly and brutally overturn repressive regimes? Do they contemplate a populist revolt threatening their wealth? Do they ever think about another American Revolution?
Or are the rich and powerful thinking that all these millions of disenchanted Americans will continue to placate themselves by venting their anger on websites, participating in national and grassroots groups protesting societal ills, writing letters to newspapers and posting signs in their yards, and voting for politicians that promise CHANGE? Are they thinking that the masses of suffering Americans are just too distracted by all their hard work and pain, just too dumb, or just too pessimistic about fighting the SYSTEM to actually take up arms in pursuit of happiness? Are they confident that the police and military that THEIR government controls can and will protect them from violent revolutionaries? Or, are they confident that the two-party system will continue to prevent open rebellion with shallow promises of change? Do they believe that there are no limits to how the masses can be manipulated and brainwashed? Hubris can bite you.
In the past I wrote that despite revolting conditions, Americans seemed completely unready to revolt. But things have steadily gotten worse. Not that long ago few of us foresaw millions of Americans losing their homes because of the shenanigans of the financial sector, millions of people facing daily pain because of historically high gasoline prices, and millions more struggling with rising food prices. Lifestyles and quality of life are now tangibly impacted.
Support for change-politicians like Ron Paul, John Edwards and Barack Obama provide evidence of the populist pot boiling over. The current presidential race and upcoming general election are providing a peaceful venting of pent up anger and disillusionment with unshared national prosperity, at least for those that still believe voting matters. All elections offer is broken promises. This electoral bait and switch is what the two-party plutocracy uses to maintain status quo stability.
The post-election period will repeat history as the two-party plutocracy in service of the Upper Class uses its muscle to prevent true and meaningful systemic changes to alleviate the woes of most Americans. Even with Barack Obama as president.
What then? Will there be enough energy left among the bitter, anxious and angry to spark a revolution? Will people in this most violent and most gun-crazy nation on Earth finally realize that voting no longer works?
Will the horrendous hubris of the Upper Class and the lying politicians that serve them be proven correct, because Americans remain unready to revolt despite revolting conditions? Will the suffering masses remain compliant and subservient, complaining and moaning, depressed and disillusioned, but not openly revolting?
You will decide.
Will you do more than vote, talk, read and write in the usual ways? Will the Upper Class fear activists, populists and progressives? Will dissidents on the left and right join together to fight a common enemy? Or with horrendous hubris will elites continue to feed their greed through economic tyranny?
Let’s start the revolution by not voting for either the Democratic or Republican presidential candidate, but instead voting for an independent or third party candidate. I recommend Ralph Nader, whose integrity and populist policy positions truly support we the people.
[Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through www.delusionaldemocracy.com.]
__________________________
Our delusional democracy needs a constitutional convention
I recommend Ralph Nader as well n/t
"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Heh
This year the most likely potential spoiler is on your side of the fence.
Hopefully he'll pick off a little McCain support.
__________________________Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
unlikely :)
In the end, libertarian candidates, even mildly well known (regionally in this case), don't attract any real (>1%) support.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
Polls show Barr getting 6% in his home state of Georgia....
..That could be anough to flip a red state to blue.... especially if the AA community in Atlanta turns out in huge numbers.
__________________________“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” --- Albert Einstein
but in the end
he'll be lucky to get 1% even in GA... Electoral history does not favor him.
__________________________"To discuss evil in a manner implying neutrality, is to sanction it." AR
I voted Nader in 2000
I had hoped he could break the 5% threshold to get federal support but he really didn't get close. In 2004 his support was much smaller (no doubt in part due to ire from some liberals that argue he caused Gore's loss).
I just don't see Nader making much of a difference going forward (although I do sincerely thank him for the great good he has accomplished in his life).
All in all I think the plutocratic culture of America is too deeply embedded to fix without essentially starting over.
__________________________I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Outside of members of the Bush administration....
...no American citizen is more responsible for the 4600+ military deaths in Iraq than Ralph Nader.
If Nader doesn't run, Gore wins Florida easily (Nader got 10s of thousands of voters in a state Bush won by 500). Gore always wins NH easily without Nader in the race.
The second choice for the overwhelming majority of Nader voters was Gore, according to exit polls.
Ralph Nader begat the Bush Administration. The Bush Administration is responsible for the Iraqi war.
Ralph Nader has blood on his hands.
__________________________“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” --- Albert Einstein
As I was saying... (nt)
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
sure, blame Nader for your own impotence
If the qualification is that they helped Bush get elected, how about you first look at the ~50% of American voters who voted for Bush? How about all the people who contributed to his campaign?
Anyway, I didn't hear Gore proposing any "exit strategy" for our siege of Iraq. What did you want us to do--just maintain the embargo until every Iraqi had died of starvation and poor sanitation?
Nader's big "sin" is that he didn't fall in line with your plan. You sound like Bush: "either you're with us or you're against us".
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
these calculations are BS
By the flow of this argument, it seems that the author thinks that 80% of Americans impoverished or on the verge of poverty. He discounts the possibility that there is a sizable chunk of the population that isn't quite "affluent" (with $40,000 cars), but is living pretty comfortably...even if it is less comfortably than last year.
It would be silly for them to flip out over a economic downturn, which we have every reason to believe will be temporary, and most of them will weather just fine. In five years, most of us will be on the upswing again.
For some perspective, I think about 60% of American homes have cable -- which is a frivolous expense of about $30 per month. We have along way to go until we are really hurting...but we might not be able to afford those $5 lattes at Starbucks anymore!
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
Well it does go on to give examples
of specific ways that some americans are drastically affected by income inequality. Considering how staggeringly wealthy a nation we are it really is criminal that anyone goes to bed hungry, any kids try to do without adequate school supplies, anyone goes without basic preventative medical care, and so on.
Is everyone in bad shape? Of course not. But our society as a whole is impacted.
__________________________I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
what's the solution?
It seems that the author is offering two possible solutions:
Both of these are pretty pointless as strategies for change unless you can convince a large number of people to follow the same strategy...which is why it matters how many Americans are really feeling the pain.
I'm all for lodging a protest vote as a means of self-expression (which is all that voting is anyway), but this isn't a solution of any sort.
I think there is great value in making sure that Americans are aware of the suffering of their neighbors, and the risk that the associated economic/political troubles can knock on their own doors...but to a large extent, many Americans have the ability to make the necessary changes even with our current imperfect political system.
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
Lots of potential solutions
but as you say the problem is getting the buy in from enough people to overcome inertia (and some solutions face more resistance than others, of course).
For my part I'm pretty well settled into a spectator mode. I have my own suspicions about what would be best but they aren;t popular, meanwhile the mass of humanity rushes towards what I believe is a cliff.
*shrug*
I can't dissuade or shift them. The human herd is moved by deep psycho-social trends, not individual action. So the options are to give myself an ulcer or kick back and witness. Maybe they'll surprise me.
__________________________I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
cause for optimism
I think there's plenty that can be done on the small scale (individual, voluntary group, and local government)--you won't save "society" but you'll save yourself and your neighbors and take some pressure off of the broader society. It's foolish to focus on strategies that only pay off when a massive group buys into them.
Along those lines, Buchananites will never vote for Nader. Even if they did ally, it would only produce chaos. When the "left" and the "right" join forces to overthrow the establishment, they turn on each other as soon as they are victorious, and one faction makes themselves into the new establishment--just as corrupt as the old (see the Iranian revolution for an example).
The point of all of this is that you need to establish real alternative institutions before dismantling the establishment. While humanity very well may nuke itself to oblivion, we also have the potential to create a paradise. I'm optimistic because I think this recession stings enough to get Americans to realize that propsperity doesn't "just happen", but it won't be bad enough to destroy our opportunity to build a better world.
__________________________"You have seen how a man was made a slave; you shall see how a slave was
made a man." --Frederick Douglas
Point well taken, Tlaloc
This:
says it, in a nutshell. People, for the most part, aren't that strong psychologicall and emotionally, and are easily swayed by whatever present deep psycho-social trends exist at the time--they're mostly followers, inotherwords.
Depeche Mode?
"Sheeple" are "Sheeple" so why is that we get along so awfully?
__________________________In our society, people are rewarded for pretending to be certain about things they're clearly not certain about. -- Sam Harris,