You're both just wasting electrons.

If you two can't get along just don't reply to each other's posts.

Think of this as a kind request, not anything official.

I have been banned from editing pages related to William M. Connolley, not to be confused with the user William M. Connolley (who is the same person). I was trying to get criticism of Mr. Connolley added to his biography based on an Op/Ed that was written about him and others specifically related to the global warming debate and how they control the wikipedia pages on that topic and I was being particularly pointy about it so the ban isn't really unfair. In actuality, though, it isn't much of a ban since it really only keeps me from writing neutral or good things about him because anything negative is already effectively banned because of his friends there.

See Wikipropaganda . This is an article by Lawrence Solomon which was originally published in the National Post of Canada (where he is a regular contributor) but it was ultimately picked up by the National Review Online and CBS News. It actually does a good job of describing the reality of the wikipedia global warming coverage.

The whole experience was enlightening, actually. I am certain that the fact that they were unable to completely ban me really annoys those who supported such a thing. He he. If you are interested you can read the rather lengthy proceeding here .

My primary antagonist is a long time editor , who is now maintaining an attack page on me (which is against policy). This latter point is something I will sit on until an opportune moment presents itself. In the mean time I'll just let him compile a list of our interactions and when the time is right I'll use that very list against him not only because the list itself violates policy but because it will provide a nice repository of links from which to illustrate his deceptions. :)