Keep Their Heads Ringing
"This election is not about issues," said Davis. "This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates."Washington Post
So once again this election won’t be about the issues from the Republican standpoint. I’m shocked! I can’t understand why they wouldn’t want to run on the issues. We haven’t had a campaign debate about the issues in the last 20 years. The Republicans have gradually moved the electorate away from the issues and have made each election a referendum on some social issue beginning with the Nixon southern strategy. At that point it was a referendum on law and order and the civil rights movement. At which time the American voting public voted resoundingly against progress.
In each subsequent election since then they have sought to divide our nation. You see the only way the Republicans can win is if they are able to divide us because there aren’t a sufficient number of fringe elements to sustain their policies or issues. You see when you only cater to the top 5% of the population it is hard to get elected; a conundrum to say the least. So how can a Party that caters to the wealthiest of Americans get elected and sometimes even maintain a majority? They have done it through deception and the age old strategy that the wealthy have always relied upon divide the masses. Throughout the years the Republicans have developed ingenious methods to carry out their strategy.
The most successful and nefarious plan has been the false “American Dream” scenario, where anyone in America can become rich and thus be in need of the Republicans policies that protect the wealthy. They have managed to convince a significant number of Americans that they too can someday be in the top 5% if they continue to support the Republican “trickle down” and supply side economic policies. So you have Americans earning 30,000 dollars a year voting with those making millions as if their interests were identical. What do I have in common with Bill Gates? How are our interests compatible?
The second strategy has been the race card or “white privilege”. In this scenario the scheme is to convince a majority of white voters that no matter what a black or minority has the white will always be better. Not only will they always be better, but the Republicans will be the ones to protect the tribe. They will be the ones to keep the other tribes in their places and thus protect the centuries old doctrine of white male dominance. This plan is supported by false studies that link all of the white societies problems to blacks and immigrant populations. Affirmative action, loose immigration, and social programs are all viewed as attacks against whites. While the race card has lost some of its appeal make no mistake there are still many proponents and believers in this strategy.
The third strategy is the red state/blue state, rural versus city, north versus south, pro-life versus pro-choice, etc. What the Republicans have been successful at is turning elections into cultural wars. So instead of having a discussion about universal healthcare we get gay marriage. Instead of a discussion of how the Republicans have turned one of the largest surpluses into one of the largest deficits, we get hockey moms and pit bulls. Instead of debating why we have not made any progress towards energy independence in the last 30 years, we get the most liberal Senator ever.
According to McCain and the Republicans Barack and Michelle Obama are not “our kind of people”, they don’t represent our America values. They are elitist and represent “the selfish” Washington interest. The Republican strategy has become if you say something enough times on enough TV programs then it’s true. John McCain and Sarah Palin are reformers because we say so, they’re records are immaterial. Barack Obama and Joe Biden are supporters of terrorism and are unpatriotic because we say so, regardless of their records of service to their country. Publicly they are calling them elitist, but behind closed doors and Republicans in the south are referring to them as uppity. Calling a black person uppity is tantamount to a racial slur because usually following it comes the N word. Again we must keep them ni__ers in their place and that doesn’t include the White House.
I am coming to the belief that for whatever reason people in America no longer care about the truth. It seems that the more of the truth about Governor Palin surfaces the more her appeal rises. It’s almost as if we are living in some bizarro world where everything works in reverse. Lies become truth and truth becomes lies. The more this woman is exposed as being a fraud the more popular she becomes. The more she repeats her spiel of five convention lines, the more McCain’s numbers rise. Why should the Republicans change now these same tactics have worked and been honed for the past 20 years, culminating in the rise of George W.
The frustration with this process is seen in the faces of many Americans, but I am not sure there are enough people to reverse this trend. We have entered into a very dangerous area in a democracy. We are being mocked by leaders and citizens of other countries for the soap opera that our elections have become. Many foreign journalists have discussed how instead of focusing on issues our candidates and campaigns are debating cosmetics and farm animals. We have allowed our campaigns to become a cacophony of sound bite politics. The difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is that the Republicans have figured out that the majority of the electorate are not political junkies who research platforms and white papers of the issues. The Democrats still believe that the majority of voters actually follow the details of the campaigns. The Republicans know that the majority of voters rely on sound bites and pundits. Because of this knowledge they craft their campaigns to capitalize on the short attention span of these voters. They develop false catch phrases and repeat them incessantly relying on the electorate’s laziness to pull it off. If you hear something enough it has to be true; remember if they say it on TV it has to be true. And they have every politician, pundit, and Party official repeating the lines over and over. This repetition of falsehoods is enough to “keep their heads ringing”.
As scarce as truth is, the supply has always been in excess of the demand. - Josh Billings
- Forgiven's diary
- Login or register to post comments

Comments :
As old as civiliation itself
Thats what the Brits are doing right now, blaming the "Polacks" for taking "their" jobs.
Thats what the Americans did to the Irish, NINA,
and more than a few other groups, including those "savages."
In our society, people are rewarded for pretending to be certain about things they're clearly not certain about. -- Sam Harris,
Obama is the one running away from the issues!
JM is now and always has been willing to talk issues, why didn't/doesn't Obama agree to town hall meetings so we can focus on issues?
Because his plans sound good in a speech, but lose their attractiveness when seen for the big government socialist expensive unsound theoretical ideas that they are!
eg; 300 billion in new spending, tax cuts (Credits) for many, but raising taxes on everything else, so that's just great if you're not planning on buying anything, his experience is less than that of Sarah Palin's and you liberals are flipping out about her experience? etc, etc.
Underlying all arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. ~M. Friedman
Which issues?
The amazing thing is that McCain is actually running a campaign with less specifics than Obama (which is saying something). He mentions issues in passing but when has he suggested any actual fixes or specific approaches?
We might as well call this the war of the vapid talking points.
Uh, no. Palin is even less experienced than Obama (again- saying something!). Now granted she's the VP not the pres candidate but McCain's health and age suggest there is a very real chance she'll be serving out part of his term. Now McCain (and Biden) have way more experience than Obama.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
I suppose the Palin vs. Obama experience factor...
..is arguable either way, but Teddy Roosevelt's experience is identical to Palin's, and governors become POTUS far more often than Senators, hence the relevant corollary experience.
She has 13 years of elected official experience including being the Chief Executive of a Govenment with 25K employee's and an 11 billion dollar budget. In those 2 years she shook the place up!
Obama has 6 years in the state senate, but very limited exp in the US Senate as he has been running for POTUS his whole first term. If he's going to change things so much why are things in his sate senate district the same as before he left. The people there see no difference in their lives as a result of 6 years of having Obama work for them?
I believe SP's exp is far superior.
As for the issues, all Obama has to do is sit down with JM at a town hall. He is ready and willing and has been for months. So the why no issues in this campaign has to be owned on Obama's side of the equation.
Underlying all arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. ~M. Friedman
So now you are saying Palin has more experience than Teddy
Roosevelt?
Man can you pull stuff out your ass. Here's Teddy's bio from Wikipedia.
Teddy was:
Secretary of the Navy
Governor of NY
He was the first U.S. president to call for universal health care and national health insurance.
he promoted the conservation movement, emphasizing efficient use of natural resources.
Why should Obama have a townhall with McCain? You've been acting like that is a point of contention nationally. it isn't.
You are a trip? As of this juncture in her life...
From the Wall Street Journal;
Who am I?
I'm under 45 years old,
I love the outdoors,
I hunt,
I am a Republican reformer,
I have taken on the Republican Party establishment,
I have many children,
I am a Governor wih two years experience,
I have a spot on the Republican National ticket as Vice President.
Did you guess?
~ I am Teddy Roosevelt.
Underlying all arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. ~M. Friedman
a few other things Teddy did
Served on The US Civil Service Commission 1888-1895
President of New York City Police Commissioners 1895-1897
Assistant Secretary of the Navy 1897-1898
Formed the Rough Riders volunteer cavalry regiment, held the rank of Lt. Col. and Col.
Not to mention that Teddy was coming to power a century ago when things were a tad less complicated. Hell, George Washington never had a college education so naturally that qualifies just about anyone, right? Well, no. Because you have to put it in context.
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Oh my God! Sarah Palin did that too!
for the city of Wasilla (population 6,500).
All I said was they had simularities...
...I never said they were identical, but...
Wasila City Council - Two Terms 1992-1996
Wasila Mayor 1996-2002
Chairman Alaska State Oil And Gas Commission 2003-2004
Governor State of Alaska 2006-Present
That's 16 years of elected and government service, with 6 of it as executive experience.
Say what you like, there are strong parallels between the two overall profiles.
And yes, in terms of experience and relevant achievement, her resume blow's Barry's away!
Underlying all arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. ~M. Friedman
Oh?
I can see why you can relate to the McCain/Palin ticket so well! :)
We are the environment. There is no distinction. What we do to the earth we do to ourselves. —David Suzuki
Oh good! ;-)
Actually, SP's experience is superior for the POTUS job in particular
.
Underlying all arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. ~M. Friedman
Plus
...she knows more about energy than probably anyone in the United States of America.
We are the environment. There is no distinction. What we do to the earth we do to ourselves. —David Suzuki
Well...more than Obama... (Not that thats saying much)... ;-)
Underlying all arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. ~M. Friedman