Weekend Open Thread

The case of the 8-year-old boy charged with killing his father and another man takes another strange twist, as prosecutors file to drop one murder charge. IMHO a full review of police and prosecutorial decision-making in this tragic affair would be beneficial.

Big weekend for college football, as Texas Tech tries to get past Oklahoma tonight. Seems like winter is finally here, with snow in our area. What's happening this weekend? 

Comments :

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Weird news of the day

Yoga is corrupting.

The Islamic authorities have issued a ruling, known as a fatwa, instructing the country's Muslims to avoid yoga because of its Hindu roots . . . . Malaysia's National Fatwa Council said it goes further than that and that elements of the Indian religion are inherent in yoga.

Announcing the decision, the council chairman Abdul Shukor Husin said practices like chanting and what he called worshipping were inappropriate and they could "destroy the faith of a Muslim".

[snip]

"If people want to practice yoga, the physical exercise, I think that is no problem," Professor Osman Bakar, from Malaysia's Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies, told me.

"Many Muslims would say fine. But they would object to the mixing of the two things."

"Islam is a complete way of life. Islam is able to cater to the needs of Muslims; spiritual needs, intellectual needs and other needs, material needs. So there is no need to bring in elements from outside," he added.

…………

I've seen similar complaints from a Christian perspective

I saw a Christian website once describing how Yoga is corrupting. This website put a special emphasis on how some yoga activities make reference to a serpent.

In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.

………… parent

Agreed

The key difference, however, is of scale.   This fatwa will be followed by millions and enforced by common social and cultural mores across that entire nation.

………… parent

their loss

As the rest of the world creates ever stronger ties (institutional and cultural), the Islamic extremists will keep their people isolated in the stone ages.

In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.

………… parent

Obama's use of complete sentences

Stirs Controversy from Brorowitz Report

But Mr. Obama's decision to use complete sentences in his public pronouncements carries with it certain risks, since after the last eight years many Americans may find his odd speaking style jarring. ..... According to presidential historian Davis Logsdon of the University of Minnesota, some Americans might find it "alienating" to have a President who speaks English as if it were his first language.

"Talking with complete sentences there and also too talking in a way that ordinary Americans like Joe the Plumber and Tito the Builder can't really do there, I think needing to do that isn't tapping into what Americans are needing also," she (Mrs. Palin) said.

…………

Sounds familiar

heh

 

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

Sarah Palin in 2012! You go girl!!!

It seems her appeal continues to grow as she is now "considering about 800 requests for appearances from December through 2009, with 75 percent coming from out of state."  Including a request from Oprah Winfrey!  :)

Palin's Star Soars After Political Defeat

 

I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4

…………

I wholeheartedly agree

 Sarah Palin in 2012!!!!!!!!!    Woo hoo!!!!!

Who should be her running mate? How about David Vitter?

Larry Craig? Ted Stevens? Jack Abramoff?

Your side's best bet would be Bobby Jindal, but he won't run in '12 because he actually has brains and knows it'll be a lost cause.

 

qui tacet consentire

………… parent

If you were actually secure in your position ...

 you wouldn't feel the need to mock her.  :)

I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4

………… parent

She provides too many opportunities

to be mocked. I mean really.

 I see a skit with Tina Fey doing a press conference, standing in front of a baby elephant slaughter house with a  horny young male, his pants smeared with baby elephant blood, leers lustily at the curvy female figure speaking into the microphone.  He cuts the ears off baby elephants to feed them into the sausage grinder, while Tina, as Sarah answers the question, "What do you see as the future of the Republican party?".

 Yeah we all eat turkey, but maybe the turkey slaughter house isn't the best backdrop for a press conference. But hey, it's Sarah's tacky party. Palin  2012. Run Sarah run.

 

………… parent

A theory which explains all the mocking of Obama by the right

...wouldn't you agree?

 

I won't mock her....   I'll just feel really secure in the knowledge that Obama will be a 2-term President if she is the GOP nominee in 2012.

;-)

 

I survived the Bush Administration

………… parent

If you truly believe that ...

 you would be willing to cross over in the primary to make sure she is the nominee.  Since you have stated you won't, count me skeptical of your veracity.  :)

I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4

………… parent

For anyone interested in the MN Senate recount,

this is required reading.

Bottom line, both campaigns are issuing frivolous challenges because the system is set up such that those ballots are then not counted in the total until being ruled upon, so there is the possibility of staking out "moral high ground" by overchallenging, seemingly taking the lead, and then being able to contest the results of challenge rulings as an attempt to "steal" the election.

Based on the recount results to date, the challenge patterns, and simple demographics, it is likely that Franklin will gain votes after those rulings come in. If someone tries to feed you some BS about  Franklin "stealing" the election based on rulings of challenged ballots you can be confident they are either clueless or deliberately attempting to mislead you.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

…………

I think you mean Franken.

 If someone named Franklin were to steal that election it really WOULD be a surprise!  :)

I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4

………… parent

Ha, sorry

I'm more interested in the recount process than the candidates, I guess =(

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

More

here :

...this works out to a projected gain of 242 votes for Franken statewide. Since Norm Coleman led by 215 votes in the initial count, this suggests that Franken will win by 27 votes once the recount process is complete (including specifically the adjudication of all challenged ballots).

The error bars on this regression analysis are fairly high, and so even if you buy my analysis, you should not regard Franken as more than a very slight favorite. Nevertheless, there is good reason to believe that the high rate of ballot challenges is in fact hurting Franken disproportionately, and that once such challenges are resolved, Franken stands to gain ground, perhaps enough to let him overtake Coleman.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

………… parent

anatomy of a Zombie lie (global cooling)

This is an interesting article about the supposed global cooling consensus of the 1970s over at DKos. It makes reference to a literature review (.pdf ) published in the Bulliten of the American Meterological Society :

Despite active efforts to answer these questions, the following pervasive myth arose: there was a consensus among climate scientists of the 1970s that either global cooling or a full-fledged ice age was imminent. A review of the climate science literature from 1965 to 1979 shows this myth to be false. The myth’s basis lies in a selective misreading of the texts both by some members of the media at the time and by some observers today.

In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.

…………

semi-independent confirmation

I noticed that the BAMS has their archives online (back to the 70s, seems to have gaps in it), so I decided to confirm this history myself.

Scanning thru the oldest articles, the first relevant article I came across was this:

Open Access Man's Inadvertent Modification of Weather and Climate 1043–1048 PDF (536K)

In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.

………… parent

Anecdotal confirmation

As someone who has been following this topic as an area of personal interest (the physical history and status of the planet) since the late 1970's,  well before the days of the internet and its easily accessable sources, I concur -- there was never a global consensus of cooling. 

Rather, scientists then as now have tried to explore planetary climate change scenarios and have floated various ideas for scrutiny.   What did put the idea of "a new ice age" into the popular mythos was the fact that, again, in the days of paper, magazines such as Time and Newsweek ran stories on those ideas.  Their covers ("The Coming Ice Age") are the imagery that seems to stick.

There is still the theoretical possibility that changes in the thermohaline circulation in the Atlantic brought about by melting ice could indeed change northern climate in the "cooler" direction.   The probability of that happening is what is still being debated.  But even today,  few true scientists will say the probability of that is zero.  It might be very small, but it's not zero, simply because of the complexity of the system being discussed.  Saying it is zero assumes we know and have properly accounted for all variables.

………… parent

RealCLimate talked about this a few years ago

I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.

………… parent

Thomas Friedman

has just realized that the global credit crises is critcally serious and  is totally freaking out.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/opinion/23friedman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

 

…………

Jumping in...

I should be back to my normal duties after I make the transition to Columbus, but I saw this via Reason:

The U.S. government is prepared to lend more than $7.4 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers, or half the value of everything produced in the nation last year, to rescue the financial system since the credit markets seized up 15 months ago.

Wow.

The question has to be asked: Isn't the cost of a full-on crash less than $7.4 trillion?

I never broke the law; I am the law! -- George W. Bush Judge Dredd
I'm listening to...

…………

X x 700 Billion Bailout =

 7.4 trillion. That's a heck of a leverage factor. Start the printing presses, we are gonna have a money party.

 I recall reading that the actual leveraged dollar amount of the CDO's and the CDS's that the genius's in investment banking risked is somewhere around 58 to 63 Trillion! 7.4 Trillion isn't even close to covering the real cost.

  All while the the esteemed suits at the credit ratings agencies said, 'Yeah, this crap is triple A. Buy it." Meanwhile AIG insured this sh*t sandwich.

 If you stacked up pennies ten high to make a pile that equaled 63 Trillion I wonder how much land that would cover. The state of Texas? Or bigger?

 It is just beyond outrage the amount of risk these greasy haired $3,000 suits got away with because they were the 'smartest' guys in the room? All the while screaming against transparency and regulation. 

 

 

 

………… parent