Weekend Open Thread
The case of the 8-year-old boy charged with killing his father and another man takes another strange twist, as prosecutors file to drop one murder charge. IMHO a full review of police and prosecutorial decision-making in this tragic affair would be beneficial.
Big weekend for college football, as Texas Tech tries to get past Oklahoma tonight. Seems like winter is finally here, with snow in our area. What's happening this weekend?
Submitted by Brendan on Sat, 2008-11-22 07:59
Tags:

Comments :
Weird news of the day
Yoga is corrupting.
"The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." --R. Heinlein
I've seen similar complaints from a Christian perspective
I saw a Christian website once describing how Yoga is corrupting. This website put a special emphasis on how some yoga activities make reference to a serpent.
In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.
Agreed
The key difference, however, is of scale. This fatwa will be followed by millions and enforced by common social and cultural mores across that entire nation.
"The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." --R. Heinlein
their loss
As the rest of the world creates ever stronger ties (institutional and cultural), the Islamic extremists will keep their people isolated in the stone ages.
In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.
Obama's use of complete sentences
Stirs Controversy
from Brorowitz Report
I'm only half stupid
Sounds familiar
heh
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Sarah Palin in 2012! You go girl!!!
It seems her appeal continues to grow as she is now "considering about 800 requests for appearances from December through 2009, with 75 percent coming from out of state." Including a request from Oprah Winfrey! :)
Palin's Star Soars After Political Defeat
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4I wholeheartedly agree
Sarah Palin in 2012!!!!!!!!! Woo hoo!!!!!
Who should be her running mate? How about David Vitter?
Larry Craig? Ted Stevens? Jack Abramoff?
Your side's best bet would be Bobby Jindal, but he won't run in '12 because he actually has brains and knows it'll be a lost cause.
qui tacet consentire
If you were actually secure in your position ...
you wouldn't feel the need to mock her. :)
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4She provides too many opportunities
to be mocked. I mean really.
I see a skit with Tina Fey doing a press conference, standing in front of a baby elephant slaughter house with a horny young male, his pants smeared with baby elephant blood, leers lustily at the curvy female figure speaking into the microphone. He cuts the ears off baby elephants to feed them into the sausage grinder, while Tina, as Sarah answers the question, "What do you see as the future of the Republican party?".
Yeah we all eat turkey, but maybe the turkey slaughter house isn't the best backdrop for a press conference. But hey, it's Sarah's tacky party. Palin 2012. Run Sarah run.
I'm only half stupid
A theory which explains all the mocking of Obama by the right
...wouldn't you agree?
I won't mock her.... I'll just feel really secure in the knowledge that Obama will be a 2-term President if she is the GOP nominee in 2012.
;-)
I survived the Bush Administration
If you truly believe that ...
you would be willing to cross over in the primary to make sure she is the nominee. Since you have stated you won't, count me skeptical of your veracity. :)
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4For anyone interested in the MN Senate recount,
this
is required reading.
Bottom line, both campaigns are issuing frivolous challenges because the system is set up such that those ballots are then not counted in the total until being ruled upon, so there is the possibility of staking out "moral high ground" by overchallenging, seemingly taking the lead, and then being able to contest the results of challenge rulings as an attempt to "steal" the election.
Based on the recount results to date, the challenge patterns, and simple demographics, it is likely that Franklin will gain votes after those rulings come in. If someone tries to feed you some BS about Franklin "stealing" the election based on rulings of challenged ballots you can be confident they are either clueless or deliberately attempting to mislead you.
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
I think you mean Franken.
If someone named Franklin were to steal that election it really WOULD be a surprise! :)
I'm the Bugs Bunny of Swords Crossed!
-4 Strongly Disagree - 0 Meh - Strongly Agree +4Ha, sorry
I'm more interested in the recount process than the candidates, I guess =(
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
More
here
:
Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson
anatomy of a Zombie lie (global cooling)
This is an interesting article about the supposed global cooling consensus of the 1970s
over at DKos. It makes reference to a literature review (.pdf
) published in the Bulliten of the American Meterological Society
:
In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.
semi-independent confirmation
I noticed that the BAMS has their archives online (back to the 70s, seems to have gaps in it), so I decided to confirm this history myself.
Scanning thru the oldest articles, the first relevant article I came across was this:
It's from November of 1970, and it pretty clearly makes the point that this author has no idea of how the climate will change, but he makes the argument that climactic changes can happen quickly, have a big impact on humanity, and that a number of human activities could occur on a scale that impacts climate.
In my expert opinion, you should do what I tell you to do.
Anecdotal confirmation
As someone who has been following this topic as an area of personal interest (the physical history and status of the planet) since the late 1970's, well before the days of the internet and its easily accessable sources, I concur -- there was never a global consensus of cooling.
Rather, scientists then as now have tried to explore planetary climate change scenarios and have floated various ideas for scrutiny. What did put the idea of "a new ice age" into the popular mythos was the fact that, again, in the days of paper, magazines such as Time and Newsweek ran stories on those ideas. Their covers ("The Coming Ice Age") are the imagery that seems to stick.
There is still the theoretical possibility that changes in the thermohaline circulation in the Atlantic brought about by melting ice could indeed change northern climate in the "cooler" direction. The probability of that happening is what is still being debated. But even today, few true scientists will say the probability of that is zero. It might be very small, but it's not zero, simply because of the complexity of the system being discussed. Saying it is zero assumes we know and have properly accounted for all variables.
"The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire." --R. Heinlein
RealCLimate talked about this a few years ago
www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/01/the-global-cooling-myth/
I came. I saw. I posted.
Veni, Vidi, Bitchy.
Thomas Friedman
has just realized that the global credit crises is critcally serious and is totally freaking out.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/opinion/23friedman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
I'm only half stupid
Jumping in...
I should be back to my normal duties after I make the transition to Columbus, but I saw this
via Reason:
Wow.
The question has to be asked: Isn't the cost of a full-on crash less than $7.4 trillion?
I never broke the law; I am the law! --
George W. BushJudge DreddI'm listening to...
X x 700 Billion Bailout =
7.4 trillion. That's a heck of a leverage factor. Start the printing presses, we are gonna have a money party.
I recall reading that the actual leveraged dollar amount of the CDO's and the CDS's that the genius's in investment banking risked is somewhere around 58 to 63 Trillion! 7.4 Trillion isn't even close to covering the real cost.
All while the the esteemed suits at the credit ratings agencies said, 'Yeah, this crap is triple A. Buy it." Meanwhile AIG insured this sh*t sandwich.
If you stacked up pennies ten high to make a pile that equaled 63 Trillion I wonder how much land that would cover. The state of Texas? Or bigger?
It is just beyond outrage the amount of risk these greasy haired $3,000 suits got away with because they were the 'smartest' guys in the room? All the while screaming against transparency and regulation.
I'm only half stupid