R9GjJA Thanks again for the post.Really thank you! Keep writing.
I posted this to get to the heart of the matter on Sotomayor and the lively discussion regarding her nomination.
I think it would behoove all of us to properly define what exactly an "activist judge" is. I would define an activist judge as one who does not follow the law and legal precedent when making a legal determination. Rather, such a judge would substitute what they think the law should be rather than what it is. However, there is a caveat.
A judge on the Supreme Court need not follow precedent, as bad precedent needs to be overturned. A district court or appeals court judge does need to follow any precedent, regardless of how wrong that precedent is. IIRC, Gonzalez v. Carhart was a model for how judges should act: district and appeals courts struck down the law banning partial birth abortion based on precedent and the law. The Supreme Court then changed the precedent.
Please offer up your own definitions of an activist judge and whether or not you'd agree that courts inferior to the Supreme Court are beholden to bad precedent.
Y2hbjP Fantastic article.Really thank you! Really Cool.
hXWfCP Awesome article post.Much thanks again. Awesome.
OagXyW Really enjoyed this post. Fantastic.
ErmfjZ Very good blog.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.
gWEw3F I loved your article post.Really thank you! Keep writing.
jovoVw Say, you got a nice article.Much thanks again. Really Great.
Ender's video which featured the former Clinton supporter indirectly reminded me of the topic of judicial appointments and its effect on voters.
A common argument for McCain that has been used to shore up his support among the base is that he will appoint strict constructionist judges in the mold of Antonin Scalia while Obama will try to pack the court with far left ideologues. That, in and of itself, is a good enough reason to pull the lever for McCain, regardless of what views he may have on other issues. Indeed, a McCain presidency could finally be what overturns Roe v. Wade. Lets take a moment to dissect these arguments.
VYXURj Thank you for your blog article.Really thank you! Much obliged.
ax37ve I really enjoy the post.Much thanks again. Really Great.
bWCsYz I truly appreciate this post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.
Wh6rrM Great, thanks for sharing this blog article.Thanks Again. Awesome.
zACYTt I really liked your article post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.
qXZugC Thanks for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.
How would you improve and standardize our criminal justice system to minimize the possibility of wrongful convictions? Some possibilities and background below the fold.
This is very unfair and plain wrong.
For all the talk of "freedom" that the Paulbots claim to believe in, they sure as heck have been silent on the horrible FISA bill we're fighting to fix in the Senate right now. Same for Ron Paul. Why the silence? And the CATO people and the libertarian publications like Reason, where are they?
srPdJA Wow, great blog post.Really thank you!